Former Soldier Denies Seeking Iranian Assistance After Prison Escape

The dramatic escape of former soldier Daniel Khalife from HMP Wandsworth has raised numerous questions about his intentions and actions during his time on the run. Khalife, who is now 23 years old, has denied claims that he solicited help from Iranian agents after fleeing from the prison in September 2023. His testimony at Woolwich Crown Court has revealed a tangled web of interactions and decisions made during those crucial days.

Escape and Charges

Khalife’s escape was nothing short of audacious. He managed to evade authorities by hiding beneath a food delivery truck, utilizing a makeshift sling for concealment. Following this escape, he pleaded guilty to charges related to his flight but has firmly denied any violations of the Official Secrets Act or the Terrorism Act. Furthermore, he faces accusations of orchestrating a bomb hoax.

During his testimony, Khalife acknowledged sending messages via Telegram to an Iranian contact on the third day of his evasion. He stated that these messages were not requests for assistance but rather borne out of curiosity regarding potential responses. He emphasized that he had no intention of leaving the UK.

Khalife claimed that while Iranian security services expressed a willingness to help him, he ultimately chose not to pursue the conversation further.

Prosecutors alleged that Khalife lingered in west London’s Chiswick area, anticipating aid that never materialized. When questioned about why he did not turn himself in sooner, he mentioned wanting to remain free for “at least 48 hours.”

Life on the Run

While evading capture, Khalife exhibited resourcefulness. He purchased a mobile phone for £89 in Hammersmith and bought clothing from Marks & Spencer. His activities included strolling along the River Thames and cycling before being apprehended by police three days later.

Khalife also claimed that his motivation for escaping was to avoid being placed in a high-security unit alongside individuals he feared would harm him.

In response to inquiries about whether he would have continued fleeing if not caught, he noted that central London was rife with surveillance cameras, indicating an awareness of the risks involved in his flight.

Khalife’s case continues to unfold, raising concerns about security protocols within correctional facilities and highlighting the complexities surrounding individuals with military backgrounds navigating legal challenges.

As this story develops, it underscores broader issues related to prison security and post-release monitoring practices—questions that may resonate far beyond this singular case.