The Unite union has urged the government to reconsider its recent decision to reduce the winter fuel payment for millions of elderly citizens, warning that it could lead to a judicial review. This decision, which affects payments ranging from £100 to £300 for most pensioners, was announced in July and confirmed during the Autumn Budget.

Criticism has been directed at Labour regarding this decision, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves stating that the cut was necessary to address a £22 billion deficit in public finances. Unite’s general secretary, Sharon Graham, expressed that it is still possible for Labour to acknowledge the negative impact of this policy and reverse their stance on reducing support for pensioners.

Approximately 10 million seniors are expected to lose their winter fuel payment, although those on pension credit or other means-tested assistance will still receive it. On October 29, Unite’s legal team sent a pre-action letter to the government claiming that a thorough assessment of the decision’s effects on individuals had not been conducted. The government admitted in September that there had not been an extensive evaluation, although a limited “equalities analysis” was made available.

The letter identified Works and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall as a potential defendant. While the government has 14 days to respond—until November 12—the union has requested a reply by November 7. A comment from the government is being awaited.

The letter further stated that the government is legally obligated to submit cuts like these to the Social Security Advisory Committee and should have collected more evidence regarding their impact on vulnerable and disabled individuals. The situation is described as “urgent,” especially with colder weather approaching and its potential effects on those struggling to maintain heating or manage other essential expenses.

Graham questioned how a Labour government could choose to eliminate winter fuel allowances for millions of pensioners just before winter arrives. Prime Minister Keir Starmer had previously defended this difficult decision, arguing it was necessary due to financial constraints facing the country and blaming prior administrations for failing to address issues like winter fuel costs.

In Scotland, a couple has received permission to pursue legal action against both UK and Scottish governments regarding the removal of this benefit. They criticized the government’s allocation of funds for compensation in other areas while excluding women affected by changes in pension age from such packages. Age UK is advocating for lifting restrictions on eligibility for Winter Fuel Payments.